Freedom Fest Interviews

Sam Sorbo interviews Amy Bohn at Freedom Fest.  They cover California bill AB 1955 and other parental rights battles currently going on in California.


https://restoration-news.com/exclusive-california-parents-rights-group-sets-the-example-in-a-blue-state

The president of PERK tells FreedomFest activists they can have an effect, even in a blue state, if they unite and fight for parents rights.

Parents Rights took the main stage at the 2024 FreedomFest in Las Vegas in July. One of the main participants was PERK—Protection of the Education Rights of Kids. An enthusiastic group of women who run PERK told everyone they could reach how they could fight back against the oppression of the state. Even in a blue state like California.


Mark welcomes Amy Bohn of PERK. We focus on CA AB1955, which was on the governor's desk on Thursday, 7/11/2024, when we had the conversation. Governor Newsom signed this atrocious bill into law on Monday, 7/15/2024.
Website: https://www.perk-group.com/

Protecting Parental Rights discussed on The Joy of Life Podcast

Protecting Parental Rights: Amy Bohn on School Secrecy Policies and COVID Mandates

- The Joy of Living Podcast

9/10/24 In this powerful episode, host Barry Shore welcomes Amy Bohn, co-founder and president of PERK (Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids), to discuss the critical issues facing parents and families today. Amy shares her expertise on the growing concern over school secrecy policies, often involving withholding vital information from parents about their children’s health and well-being. She explains how these policies can lead to alarming situations, including the involvement of Child Protective Services (CPS) and potentially separating children from their families. Amy and Barry also dive deep into the ongoing conversation around COVID mandates in schools, exploring their legal, ethical, and societal impacts on both students and parents. This episode uncovers the challenges parents face in protecting their rights, the need for school transparency, and the importance of advocating for informed consent. Please tune in for an eye-opening discussion that empowers parents to navigate these complex issues and safeguard their children’s future.

Listen to Podcast here: https://barryshore.com/protecting-parental-rights-amy-bohn-on-school-secrecy-policies-and-covid-mandates/

You can also find this podcast by searching 'The JOY of LIVING' in your preferred app - or by clicking this link for Apple Podcasts or this one for Google Play.

  1. Sarah K. – "Wow, I had no idea PERK was doing so much behind the scenes! It's amazing to hear how they're standing up for parental rights and medical freedom. California needs this kind of leadership!"

  2. Mike J. – "This episode was eye-opening. The work PERK is doing for first responders and teachers is incredible. It’s inspiring to know that people are out there fighting for our rights!"

  3. Laura M. – "Listening to how PERK started with a group of passionate moms gives me hope. It shows that grassroots movements can really make a difference. Keep fighting, PERK!"

  4. James T. – "PERK’s advocacy work is phenomenal. The fact that they've filed lawsuits against government overreach and won is a huge victory for everyone! Kudos to the team."

  5. Angela W. – "Hearing about PERK’s mission really hit home for me as a parent. Protecting our rights to raise our children the way we see fit is crucial, and PERK is leading the charge."

  6. David L. – "Amazing episode! I didn’t realize how far-reaching PERK’s impact has been. The fact that they’re influencing not just California but the nation shows how important their work is."

  7. Jessica F. – "I’ve been following PERK’s work for a while, but this podcast really highlighted how much progress they’ve made. Thank you for sharing this important mission."

  8. Tom R. – "The part about the lawsuits really got me thinking. PERK is holding the government accountable and making real change happen. We need more organizations like this!"

  9. Emily S. – "What an inspiring story! From a group of moms to a nonprofit influencing the entire country – PERK’s growth is incredible. They’re truly making a difference."

  10. Mark D. – "This was an amazing episode! PERK’s advocacy tools mobilizing millions of people really stood out to me. They’re giving people the power to fight for their rights."

  11. Lisa B. – "This lawsuit is monumental! I’m so grateful someone is standing up for teachers who were unjustly fired for refusing the COVID vaccine. It’s about time body sovereignty is defended."

  12. Tom H. – "Wow, the fact that some teachers found out about their firing through job postings is just appalling. I can’t believe the lengths these schools went to push their mandates."

  13. Grace K. – "This episode really opened my eyes to the consequences of extreme school policies. These teachers deserve justice, and I’m glad PERK is leading the fight for their rights."

  14. Andrew M. – "I was shocked to learn that students were kicked out of school and banned from events like prom just for refusing the COVID shot. The impact on children’s education is heartbreaking."

  15. Sophia J. – "This lawsuit has the potential to set a nationwide precedent on religious rights. I’m glad someone is taking a stand for educators and students who were affected by these mandates."

  16. Jason P. – "Schools blacklisting teachers and denying them unemployment? That’s beyond cruel. PERK’s work in exposing these injustices is vital for protecting workers’ rights."

  17. Melissa S. – "I had no idea secrecy policies in schools had gotten so extreme. Parents should absolutely be informed about decisions affecting their children, especially ones with lifelong consequences."

  18. Paul R. – "Hearing about the secrecy policies that could lead to CPS involvement just for parents asking questions is chilling. I’m so glad PERK is fighting to protect families from these overreaches."

  19. Emily T. – "I had no idea teachers were being blacklisted like this. Thank you, PERK, for standing up for them!"

  20. John P. – "PERK’s fight for medical freedom is inspiring. This lawsuit could change everything!"

  21. Linda R. – "Shocking to hear about the secrecy policies in schools. Parents need to be involved!"

  22. Mark L. – "This episode was eye-opening. The impact on students has been heartbreaking."

  23. Rachel M. – "PERK is doing important work. Body sovereignty and parental rights need to be protected!"

  24. Cathy D. – "This podcast really shed light on the dangers of schools making decisions without parental consent. Hormone treatments without parental knowledge? That’s a terrifying thought."

  25. Ben W. – "PERK’s work is critical in holding schools accountable for their harmful policies. The long-term effects on both teachers and students from these mandates can’t be ignored."

Take a stand and make a donation to PERK today at : https://give.perk-group.com/standwithourteachers

FOX News interviews PERK President Amy Bohn

PERK's Amy Bohn: Newsom 'using children in this political game' of gender identity in schools

New California law prohibits educators from informing parents if students change pronouns, name or gender identity by David Unsworth Fox News

Click on image to view story and video.

Amy Bohn is the president and co-founder of California-based PERK (Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids). The organization advocates for parental rights at the local and state level, and has been a constant thorn in the side of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Bohn sat down with Fox News Digital to discuss California's recently passed legislation, AB 1955, which would prohibit educators from informing parents when their children change their pronouns, name, or gender identity at school.

NEWSOM'S SCHOOL GENDER IDENTITY LAW MANDATES 'TEACHERS MUST LIE TO PARENTS,' PARENTAL RIGHTS GROUPS SAY

Bohn argues that the legislation is a usurpation of parental rights. …. Read More

AB 1955: Frequently Asked Questions Answered.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT AB1955

by Erin Friday of Our Duty

Does AB1955 require school personnel to deceive or hide from parents their student has adopted a transgender identity?

No, not on its own. AB1955 bars any school board from adopting a board policy that requires that parents/guardians be informed that their student has adopted a transgender identity, is same-sex attracted or is gender non-conforming. (The latter two are red-herrings. Notification policies only address trans-identified students.) AB1955 does not otherwise bar school personnel from disclosing this information.

Can school personnel inform parents that their student has adopted a transgender identity?

Yes, BUT … If your school district has adopted the standard Board Policy 5145.3 and its related Administrative Regulations, it states, in relevant part: “Acts of … hostility … based upon … gender identity, … where the act has the purpose or effect of having a negative impact on the student’s academic performance or of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive educational environment are prohibited under state and federal law. Examples of types of conduct which is prohibited in the district and which may(1) constitute gender-based harassment, include but is not limited to: . . .

5. Revealing a student’s transgender status to individuals who do not have a legitimate need for the information.” (AR 5145.3)(Emphasis added.)

If you as school personnel believe that parents/guardians have a legitimate need to know that their child is rejecting their natural body, then under AR5145.3, you can inform the parents. That legitimate need is clearly demonstrated by California’s Attorney General Rob Bonta in his complaint against Chino Valley, that stated 86% of trans-identified youth have suicidal ideation and 56% have attempted suicide. The California legislature in 2023 in AB665, stated that 78% of LGBTQ youth have contemplated suicide.

For parents, if your school has adopted the full version of AR5145.3, you will be likely deceived by the school.

(1) The word “may” means “might”, not “will”.

It is notable that teacher Jessica Tapia whose school had the full version of AR5145.3 received $360,000 in a settlement.

Of course, if there is no AR5145.3 or if does not have the “transgender” section, no policy inclusive of AB1955 preclude a teacher from informing parents.

Will I violate the student’s right to privacy by involving the parents/guardians? What about the Right to Privacy section in AR 5145.3?

No. The judge in the Mirabelli case, ruled in the preliminary injunction that there is no applicable privacy right between parent and child. Additionally, under AB5145.3 the District is permitted to disclose to parents if it has a compelling evidence that “disclosure is necessary to preserve the student’s physical or mental well-being.” No medical society recommends that a child socially transition without parental input; even the loathsome transgender advocacy group, the World Professional Association of Transgender Health. Involving parents with their child who elevated suicide risk is necessary to preserve the student’s well-being.2 If you are a District employee, per AR 5145.3, you are required to inform the compliance officer if the student gives you permission, but there is no prohibition to inform the parents under the Right to Privacy section in form AR 5145.3.

What if your District does not have the section on “Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Students” in its AR 5145.3 or AR 5145.3?

Confirm there is no other board policy that addresses notifying parents. Unless you have a confidentiality obligation as a school counselor, you can inform the parents.

What about if the training that I am required to receive instructs that I cannot tell the parents of their student’s struggle with gender dysphoria without the student’s consent?

Training is not a school board policy. If you are asked to sign an agreement to abide by training that requires deceiving parents, seek some legal counsel BEFORE you sign.

What should a teacher/District employee do if the parent asks if their student has adopted a transgender identity, is using a different name or pronouns that don’t align with his/her sex?

Under the Education Code section 89535, teachers – even tenured ones - can be terminated for dishonesty. Regardless of if your District has adopted AR5145.3, you can disclose this information because you are aware of the heightened suicide risk of students who adopt a transgender identity, as this state’s Attorney General has stated.

As a school counselor, can I disclose a student’s transgender identity to the parents?

(2) The language of the AR 5145.3 policy calls this part of the policy, “guidance,” arguably turning the instructions into suggestions, rather than mandated policy directives.

Yes. If the student is under the age of 12 there is no confidentiality. If the student is 12 and older, you must access if a clear and present danger exists to the child in disclosing the information to the parents. If there is, then you cannot disclose. But if there is no clear and present danger of the parents to the child, but there is a clear and present danger to the child because of the heightened suicide risk, then you must disclose.

Are there risks if I notify the parents?

Yes. The District can discipline, suspend or terminate you. You could be named in a lawsuit, but there is strong likelihood that your union insurance will cover claim, or that the school will be the defendant, and not you. There are a number of law firms that may take your case pro bono. As stated above, you have defenses – e.g., there is legitimate need for the parents to know because of the heightened risk of suicide, First Amendment, obligation to be honest, and others.

What if I as a teacher just tell the principal, superintendent, school counselor or compliance offer?

Most likely the parents will never learn that their child is suffering from acute distress of their natural body – gender dysphoria, so you are not helping the child or the parents. Attorneys can help guide you.

Is there any way to overcome the Parental Notification Policy bar, and permit parents to control whether the school socially transitions their child?

Yes. School Board members who want more information, can email erin.friday@yahoo.com.

Read more about this topic in PERK resources.

2024 Legislative Session is Over.

Legislative Update from PERK Advocacy.

The legislative session has ended for our elected officials. Bills that have passed their final floor votes are now either on the governor’s desk or on their way there.  If there is a bill that you care or are concerned about, now is your time to contact Governor Newsom via PERK Advocacy Campaign Center or call his office (916) 445-2841 to let him know your position. Check out our PERK Advocacy Action Campaign page to see which bills we think are worth taking action on. The governor has until September 30th to veto or pass bills into law.

The following 5 bills we have identified for Governor’s request to veto or sign: 

SB-907 Orange County Board of Education: members request for veto

AB-2442 Healing arts: expedited licensure process: gender-affirming health care and gender-affirming mental health care.request for veto

AB-1949 California Consumer Privacy Act of 2020request for signature

SB-976 Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Actrequest for signature

SB-1414 Crimes: solicitation of a minor. request for signature.

Legislators are now on their recess and have returned to their local offices. Especially because it’s in an election year, it is important to take the time to reach out to your legislators and candidates running for office to let them know what you care about. You cna find your legislator here. Ask them how they would vote and see if they would support you and what you care about. Let us know what they say!

Share information about candidates in your area at info@perk-group.com

PERK Advcoacy co-Founder, Darrlene Alquiza

Darrlene shares the current status of where the bills PERK and PERK Advocacy support and oppose. And explains what each bill will do.